A couple of weeks ago, Mum proudly handed me a book she said she’d
landed on, and been saving for me. When I read the title, I immediately threw
her a suspicious glance, but I regretted my reaction when she began prattling
about how the author was a good writer, and that his humorous, genuine style
was exactly the type I might like. She was being supportive of my writing –not sending me a message about my life. When
your Mum hands you “Alternatives to Sex”, and you’re practically a virgin
again, and haven’t misbehaved, even mildly, with anyone, in such a long
time that even you can’t remember who
it last was; and romantically things are so bad that you’ve established a blog
about online dating which is the only kind dating you can lay any claim to
having done in years... you’re entitled to be a bit defensive.
“Alternatives to Sex” IS indeed a good book, and half-way through I was
already regretting there wasn’t more. It would have panicked me if I suspected
that Mum had gone very far into the book –it is set in the world of promiscuous,
gay sex, with all the politically correct and utterly embarrassing terms
involved in that activity, complete with mentions of sex toys, and lubricants,
and very unreserved poppings up of the word ‘Fuck’ in noun and conjugated verb
form. Still, she had gone far enough to feel warm towards the writer in his
honesty, and I myself was completely engaged by the bottom of page 1.
I have never thought of the practical complexities of gay romantic
life. I was brought up a Christian, voluntarily confirmed my faith in my teens,
and have never found anything in Life, mine or others, to dislodge me from it. Among
MANY other things, my faith informs me that that God isn’t happy about tattoos
(which is why I’m pierced but not tattooed, though I have a sincere craving for
a beautiful Blue Crab somewhere on my anatomy) but more importantly that He loathes
homosexuality. I am glad never to have dealt with it as a personal issue (it
sounds like I would have spent my entire life dealing with it, and nothing
else!) While I must ‘disapprove’ of it on God’s behalf, I must also follow
God’s attitude of acceptance and respect for people for who they are
fundamentally, rather than parts of whom they are, including those that
occasionally (or even frequently) do bad things (Love the Sinner, Hate the
Sin.) At the end of the day, in fact, if you look at everyone that way, your
attitude towards people mentally is much more peaceful and clear. While a
person’s sexual leanings rarely phase me, I am completely hostile to compulsive/manipulative/malicious
liars, cheaters, and dishonest people in general. Besides, being homosexual,
whether it is scientifically a biological issue or not, seems to me an
unnecessarily, even foolishly difficult choice of life to burden oneself with,
if it isn’t genuinely attached to a person’s core self. As one gay college
friend asked me once, “Would you choose
to be gay?” I think not.
As I am very busy battling my problems with heterosexual singlehood,
gay singlehood –the gay scene, in fact, has rarely ever crossed my mind, and
certainly never more that for three seconds together, until now. I am sorry to
say that on issues that I know little or nothing about, which have nothing to
do with me and generally do not cause me concern, I tend to inform myself at
the very minimum level possible, then take a good, safe midline (like a good
President should). In this manner, all that I actually know about gay people is
that 1) They are extremely intelligent, 2) They are exceedingly well organised,
3) They are generally creative, 4) They are strong enough in character to take
firm stands, 5) They are loyal to each other (or their sexual community,) and
6) They love to party and entertain, or be entertained, and have contributed to
this industry no doubt more than could be suspected. I am sure that these are
generalities, but they are comfortable ones for me to assume, and eminently
socially acceptable (not that I’m shy about being socially contrary, when it is
warranted.) I had heard that they are also extremely promiscuous, but the
figures that have been mentioned in such passing conversations I always took as
complete fiction –until now. “Alternatives to Sex” is appallingly shock-making
in that regard, at least, to me. I had absolutely no idea... and I’m not sure I
wanted one. Still, it’s part of an honest tale, and I have to accept it, if I
am to accept the author (Stephen Mc Cauley, which I do, whether the tale is
even a fraction biographical, which I feel it must be; or not.) The whole thing
is wonderfully intelligently insightful, refreshing, and I love its style and
tone, and sense of humour from beginning to end.
My admittedly self-centred point is that, I may have it hard, but Lord
might I have it harder. I’m not sure what makes gay relationships apparently so
very difficult to have and maintain –though the mention of couple in which one
of the males had given permission to his boyfriend to sleep regularly with
another may be a clue. We’re human beings, and gay or not, jealousy has to be
an issue in such a situation. Perhaps, also, gay men have super high sex
drives. I don’t know. I just want to send a big, warm hug to all those single
gay men (and women!) who are also in Pursuit of Happiness, and wish them the
very best of luck in their journey.
No comments:
Post a Comment